Phoenix Bicycle Accident Lawyer | ARS 28-812 | Wood Injury Law

Call Us Now

(480) 576-6147

Phoenix Bicycle Accident Lawyer | ARS 28-812 Bicycles as Vehicles | Wood Injury Law

Phoenix Arizona urban bike lane at golden hour

Phoenix Metro Bicycle Cases

Phoenix Bicycle Accident Lawyer — Arizona Treats Bicycles as Vehicles Under ARS 28-812

Drivers and their insurance carriers routinely act as if bicycles do not have road rights. Arizona law says otherwise. ARS 28-812 gives cyclists the same rights and responsibilities as drivers. That forgetting is what creates the case.

ARS 28-812
Bicycles are vehicles with same road rights
3 ft minimum
AZ “Three Foot Law” passing distance — ARS 28-735
2 Years
AZ statute of limitations under ARS 12-542

Why Phoenix Bicycle Cases Are Different Than the Defense Claims

The standard opening move in Phoenix bicycle accident defense is to treat the cyclist as if they were a pedestrian in the wrong place, or as if they were operating outside the rules of the road. Both framings are wrong under Arizona law. Under ARS 28-812, a person operating a bicycle has the same rights and is subject to the same duties as the driver of a vehicle. The case is structured around that.

This page covers the Arizona bicycle statutes, the Phoenix-area patterns where most crashes happen, and the practical decisions in the first week after a bicycle crash.

The Arizona Bicycle Statutes That Decide Phoenix Bicycle Cases

Arizona Statute

ARS 28-812 — Bicycle Operator Rights and Duties

A person riding a bicycle on a roadway or on a shoulder adjoining a roadway is granted all of the rights and is subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle, except as otherwise provided. This is the foundational statute: bicycles are vehicles. Drivers cannot treat a cyclist as a pedestrian on the side of the road.

Arizona Statute

ARS 28-735 — Three Foot Passing Law

The driver of a motor vehicle overtaking and passing a bicycle that is proceeding in the same direction on a roadway shall exercise due care by leaving a safe distance between the motor vehicle and the bicycle of not less than three feet until the motor vehicle is safely past the overtaken bicycle. Violation is direct evidence of negligence in side-swipe and pass-too-close crashes.

Arizona Statute

ARS 28-815 — Riding on Roadways and Bicycle Paths

A person riding a bicycle on a roadway at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway. “As close as practicable” is the operative phrase: the cyclist is not required to ride in the gutter or hug debris and parked car doors.

Phoenix Metro Bicycle Crash Hot Spots

Tempe and ASU campus area

High bicycle volume from student commuting. Mill Avenue, University Drive, Apache Boulevard. Crashes recur at intersection right-hooks (drivers turning right across the bike lane).

Central Phoenix bike-lane corridors

Third Street, Seventh Avenue, Camelback Road. Lane-change incidents and door collisions (“dooring”) are recurring patterns.

Scottsdale Indian Bend Wash path

The bike path itself is generally safe; the at-grade road crossings are where crashes happen.

Phoenix mountain park access routes

South Mountain Park, North Mountain, Piestewa Peak access roads. Recreational cyclist routes; weekend crash patterns.

Light rail corridor crossings

Bicycle-light-rail-vehicle interaction patterns, particularly at on-grade crossings.

The Right-Hook

The most common Phoenix bicycle-versus-car crash

A motor vehicle traveling in the same direction as a bicycle turns right across the bicycle’s path, often without signaling. The cyclist has no time to react. The driver claims they did not see the cyclist. Under ARS 28-754 (turn signals required) and the general duty of care, the driver was negligent. Pure comparative fault means the case turns on percentages.

Common Causes of Phoenix Bicycle Crashes

  • Right-hook turns (driver turns right across cyclist’s path)
  • Left-cross collisions (driver turns left across oncoming cyclist’s path)
  • Door collisions (parked vehicle door opens into cyclist’s path)
  • Pass-too-close incidents (violation of ARS 28-735 three-foot law)
  • Rear-end collisions (driver behind cyclist fails to slow)
  • Right-turn-on-red without yielding to cyclist in lane
  • Drivers failing to yield to cyclist in marked bike lane
  • Driver impairment

Damages You Can Recover

Bicycle injuries are routinely severe because the cyclist has no protective structure. Common injuries include traumatic brain injury (even with helmet), spinal cord injury, complex orthopedic injury, road rash and scarring, and dental injury.

  • Past and future medical expenses
  • Lost income and future earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering
  • Disfigurement and scarring
  • Permanent impairment
  • Property damage (bicycle and gear)
  • Loss of consortium
  • Punitive damages where applicable
  • Wrongful death damages where applicable

The First Seven Days After a Phoenix Bicycle Crash

  1. Get full medical evaluation including head imaging.
  2. Preserve the bicycle and gear (helmet, clothing) as evidence.
  3. Photograph the scene, damage, and your injuries.
  4. Get the crash report.
  5. Do not give a recorded statement to the at-fault insurer.
  6. Identify witnesses.
  7. Contact a Phoenix bicycle accident attorney within 7-14 days.

Why Wood Injury Law for Your Phoenix Bicycle Case

  • No fees unless we recover.
  • Free initial consultation.
  • Direct attorney attention from Josh Wood.
  • ARS 28-812 / 28-735 statute expertise.
  • Phoenix metro focus.

Frequently Asked Questions About Phoenix Bicycle Claims

How long do I have to file a Phoenix bicycle accident lawsuit?
Two years from the date of the accident under ARS 12-542.
I was not wearing a helmet. Can I still recover?
Yes. Arizona does not require adult cyclists to wear helmets. The absence of a helmet may be raised on comparative fault but does not bar recovery.
The driver said I came out of nowhere. Does that affect my case?
Generally an admission of failing to keep proper lookout, not a defense. Drivers have a duty to scan for cyclists and pedestrians in the road and on shoulders.
I was riding in the bike lane and got hit. Whose fault is that?
Generally the driver’s. ARS 28-812 grants cyclists in marked bike lanes the same rights as drivers in their lane. Encroaching on the bike lane to pass, turn, or park is the violation.
The driver opened their door into my path. Is that a case?
Yes. Drivers must check before opening doors into traffic. Door collisions (“dooring”) are a recurring Phoenix bicycle crash pattern with clear liability.
What if I was riding at night without lights?
Arizona requires bicycles operated at night to have a front white light and rear reflector under ARS 28-817. Absence may be raised on comparative fault. Pure comparative fault still allows recovery.
The driver hit me and drove off. What now?
Hit-and-run bicycle cases use the same investigative tools as hit-and-run pedestrian cases. Witness descriptions, cameras, license plate reader data. Uninsured motorist coverage may apply.
What does it cost to hire a Phoenix bicycle accident attorney?
Nothing out of pocket. Contingency representation: no fees unless we recover.

Hit on a Bicycle in Phoenix?

The driver and their insurer are framing you as if you didn’t belong on the road. ARS 28-812 says you did. Free consultation, no fee unless we recover.

📞 Call (480) 937-2116 Now